[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007403: marked as done (libcitadel: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:04:01 +0000
with message-id <E1oRBab-00FFrY-Nx@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007403: fixed in libcitadel 917-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007403,
regarding libcitadel: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007403: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007403
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: libcitadel
Version: 917-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: libcitadel
Source-Version: 917-4
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libcitadel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007403@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated libcitadel package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:43:52 +0200
Source: libcitadel
Architecture: source
Version: 917-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007403
Changes:
 libcitadel (917-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to 3.0 (quilt) format (Closes: #1007403).
   * Use debhelper-compat level 12 (11 is deprecated).
Checksums-Sha1:
 17ec229e235dba08836ab136382e88c7a6b41a25 1752 libcitadel_917-4.dsc
 f98d146449dbd81e6250a12dfc5f2cc8904d9519 9804 libcitadel_917-4.debian.tar.xz
 31de42d749d6a36bbe0de9a6aeab9dc09578c17d 5558 libcitadel_917-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 17de2ea3335a7f9e4bc2609c97e6b6cba229d08f60f83b317b93c64ae85c5b57 1752 libcitadel_917-4.dsc
 97b2055547251cf4ce011c32238527121ee404294d7ee2c6db0fc69c27b4c93e 9804 libcitadel_917-4.debian.tar.xz
 a808ff7029d8cf36fc746511cdb7f44b45e2faa6559b3f2b559dbb65dfcc6bbd 5558 libcitadel_917-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 8aa425a2d33b3ca8925e100eedf007d1 1752 libs optional libcitadel_917-4.dsc
 6896bd32dd8f5ea739001e4655e7ca6c 9804 libs optional libcitadel_917-4.debian.tar.xz
 a96419aeae74e8954606431cc5534d48 5558 libs optional libcitadel_917-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/twe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: