[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007639: marked as done (glbsp: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2022 11:19:34 +0000
with message-id <E1oRAta-00F8pD-8X@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007639: fixed in glbsp 2.24-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007639,
regarding glbsp: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007639: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007639
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: glbsp
Version: 2.24-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: glbsp
Source-Version: 2.24-7
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
glbsp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007639@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated glbsp package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:58:05 +0200
Source: glbsp
Architecture: source
Version: 2.24-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007639
Changes:
 glbsp (2.24-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to 3.0 (quilt) format (Closes: #1007639).
Checksums-Sha1:
 6eb5217f93f4d1e6373d9e67332cf5daa76e09bb 1745 glbsp_2.24-7.dsc
 75a92b509d519721ef72652c58af370d68bb0074 4540 glbsp_2.24-7.debian.tar.xz
 b2532524121593f92b6d603bde274dfb12dd0fe5 5542 glbsp_2.24-7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 e976b3ad4466e4ed003b76ad9a87276562f0845eacc416883b40e7811019e74e 1745 glbsp_2.24-7.dsc
 3c499a438da512b4861cc7f7bc7e82882aa67def2b7840de2cb0e31ced3f831c 4540 glbsp_2.24-7.debian.tar.xz
 9ed6afba000b75326426d0753b9ca0d15be94feda4103a7299c3e5cbad74bc57 5542 glbsp_2.24-7_source.buildinfo
Files:
 91a9ee08c8d98f9df7e59e6122075e7a 1745 utils optional glbsp_2.24-7.dsc
 626e9ec6318317952105acb15504ec20 4540 utils optional glbsp_2.24-7.debian.tar.xz
 cfc7bd1ff3aad16f48dc0472d677a0e0 5542 utils optional glbsp_2.24-7_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=LqcX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: