[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007480: marked as done (aylet: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:48:50 +0000
with message-id <E1oRAPq-00F3fi-9d@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007480: fixed in aylet 0.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007480,
regarding aylet: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007480: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007480
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: aylet
Version: 0.5-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: aylet
Source-Version: 0.5-4
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
aylet, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007480@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated aylet package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:31:55 +0200
Source: aylet
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007480
Changes:
 aylet (0.5-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to 3.0 (quilt) format (Closes: #1007480).
Checksums-Sha1:
 f89847b53b6de7eabddb84a53b5abfa149c2305a 1607 aylet_0.5-4.dsc
 02e5ae28e5c1ee6c8452e2bf3884dceb272b7210 5008 aylet_0.5-4.debian.tar.xz
 1cfec22136fd43986f7c3371cc008ca403d9e82c 10875 aylet_0.5-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 eaf3e8916eaabd8129a276f941c6e553800884f5ef26e8d450841ced17a46f58 1607 aylet_0.5-4.dsc
 49683dce0af8fb1be79a88f00e6b58550347ba259e79e6277a32e6941f54fca2 5008 aylet_0.5-4.debian.tar.xz
 201b7b6b67647254588788926169621656f3758d98e34f069b805c5348171f51 10875 aylet_0.5-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 df4e2767f85f622604a4ac8f4460d390 1607 otherosfs optional aylet_0.5-4.dsc
 dbdaaf8b95ef5d8cf460eaaca7481b2f 5008 otherosfs optional aylet_0.5-4.debian.tar.xz
 feeff3eabca0c83497f4facfe2e15843 10875 otherosfs optional aylet_0.5-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=11oq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: