[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007075: marked as done (dpkg-cross: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:35:04 +0000
with message-id <E1oyIw4-00FOpM-DJ@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007075: fixed in dpkg-cross 2.6.19
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007075,
regarding dpkg-cross: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007075
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: dpkg-cross
Version: 2.6.18+nmu2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-kp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: dpkg-cross
Source-Version: 2.6.19
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpkg-cross, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007075@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated dpkg-cross package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:47:05 +0100
Source: dpkg-cross
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.19
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007075
Changes:
 dpkg-cross (2.6.19) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to 3.0 source format (Closes: #1007075).
   * d/copyright: Convert to machine-readable format.
Checksums-Sha1:
 813b864a1b77721a06380ba9668daa0c3ba0d0bd 1408 dpkg-cross_2.6.19.dsc
 2cab762ab5619ef6dd912162d6e2d7a8c2a3e976 63120 dpkg-cross_2.6.19.tar.xz
 8866829d4624f9fdbcb583466df9246ecee5c85d 5597 dpkg-cross_2.6.19_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 bd41c9959fcfc85aee9deaeade16c01966a8e4958b02ff1476f3e2213ce4be03 1408 dpkg-cross_2.6.19.dsc
 a309c9c9159bcbad38c19a72cb5c13e7d2875dc938113410fa876830cdefdf85 63120 dpkg-cross_2.6.19.tar.xz
 8d39274213de2b82ed34873ec58427a9712afa0ea1a2d1149eeff5c84c176a05 5597 dpkg-cross_2.6.19_source.buildinfo
Files:
 fbfc73b426a63b7e93fce64a194c12e1 1408 utils optional dpkg-cross_2.6.19.dsc
 ff0c8a62a9b7d796a463066f7413d046 63120 utils optional dpkg-cross_2.6.19.tar.xz
 7c7c4f7963ce72da733986bf53f34bd8 5597 utils optional dpkg-cross_2.6.19_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=C0w/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: