[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007441: marked as done (ddtc: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:50:40 +0000
with message-id <E1oxyZk-00AO9f-2Z@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007441: fixed in ddtc 0.17.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007441,
regarding ddtc: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007441: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ddtc
Version: 0.17.2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

This package is a native package, so the likely target is 3.0 (native), not
3.0 (quilt).


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: ddtc
Source-Version: 0.17.3
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ddtc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007441@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated ddtc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:28:29 +0100
Source: ddtc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.17.3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007441
Changes:
 ddtc (0.17.3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to 3.0 source format (Closes: #1007441).
Checksums-Sha1:
 3338b5f9b93451c4da15896d485f00272796b31c 1244 ddtc_0.17.3.dsc
 0a9959af04084c915d664f86fa53539feca0f7d1 41420 ddtc_0.17.3.tar.xz
 6f8d51219f8dbc5731da9a10bf99ff5c5ca81fc7 5554 ddtc_0.17.3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 94250011c64f1355efa7248ea04d4c74ed24714777af6c65d8d089ad3a982568 1244 ddtc_0.17.3.dsc
 b81a58bf64adf35400bc04f6222d043341dbf6e6108473c13df60694ead81867 41420 ddtc_0.17.3.tar.xz
 2b40cd28adcf6512a0b1ec6091f02fc64a146c56f2d9a32e9902f878cd2eaa2c 5554 ddtc_0.17.3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 71d2a92965188f1bac12100f3451430f 1244 text optional ddtc_0.17.3.dsc
 bf77310ddd5aa18b4141873acd7ef264 41420 text optional ddtc_0.17.3.tar.xz
 6e1568e9b6c1389d730704515022f9ae 5554 text optional ddtc_0.17.3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8GiS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: