[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#628814: marked as done (URI ignored in /etc/libnss-ldap.conf, host must be set)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2022 01:20:11 +0000
with message-id <E1ov763-0016tp-7a@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1024140: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #628814,
regarding URI ignored in /etc/libnss-ldap.conf, host must be set
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
628814: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628814
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libnss-ldap
Version: 264-2.2
Severity: normal


I'm configuring a client to do LDAP authentication for accounts on the system. In /etc/libnss-ldap.conf
I have the LDAP server uri specified (as generated by debconf). The 'host' option with the default address
of 127.0.0.1 is commented out. 

However, nscd is unable to connect to the server (I get server unavailable messages in the logs). Running
strace on getent shows it opening a connection to 127.0.0.1 (and never to the LDAP server). 

Uncommenting the 'host' option and setting it explicitly to the LDAP server address fixes the problem. 

I'm running without any security (SSL/TLS) set up. 


Best,
 
Dan 



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
  APT prefers squeeze-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'squeeze-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libnss-ldap depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]     1.5.36.1       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                     2.11.2-10      Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcomerr2                1.41.12-2      common error description library
ii  libgssapi-krb5-2          1.8.3+dfsg-4   MIT Kerberos runtime libraries - k
ii  libkrb5-3                 1.8.3+dfsg-4   MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii  libldap-2.4-2             2.4.23-7       OpenLDAP libraries
ii  libsasl2-2                2.1.23.dfsg1-7 Cyrus SASL - authentication abstra

Versions of packages libnss-ldap recommends:
ii  libpam-ldap                   184-8.5    Pluggable Authentication Module fo
ii  nscd                          2.11.2-10  Embedded GNU C Library: Name Servi

libnss-ldap suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
* libnss-ldap/dblogin: false
  libnss-ldap/override: true
* shared/ldapns/base-dn: dc=wisc,dc=edu
* libnss-ldap/rootbinddn: cn=manager,dc=wisc,dc=edu
* shared/ldapns/ldap_version: 3
  libnss-ldap/binddn: cn=proxyuser,dc=example,dc=net
* shared/ldapns/ldap-server: ldap:///192.168.0.1/
* libnss-ldap/nsswitch:
* libnss-ldap/confperm: true
* libnss-ldap/dbrootlogin: false

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 265-6+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package libnss-ldap has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1024140

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: