[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007217: marked as done (golang-openldap: openldap 2.5 transition)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Nov 2022 01:02:56 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1oukLo-00DS3A-Q1@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1024111: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007217,
regarding golang-openldap: openldap 2.5 transition
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007217: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007217
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: golang-openldap
Version: 0.2-2
Severity: important
Control: block 1006456 by -1

Dear Maintainer,

golang-openldap-dev has a hard-coded dependency on libldap-2.4-2. For 
the openldap 2.5 transition which is currently underway, the dependency 
should be updated to libldap-2.5-0.

I'm sorry for the late notice. I didn't notice the hard-coded 
dependency; the release team brought it to my attention after the 
transition started.

I also noticed the package seems to embed old copies of some libldap 
headers; these are now out-of-date. I feel like there should be some 
better solution than embedding them? If golang-openldap-dev needs them 
in /usr/share/gocode for building, maybe they could be symlinks to 
/usr/include? Happy to create a separate bug for this, if you want.

The package builds fine for me with the new version of libldap-dev, but 
I don't know any Go and I don't know how to test it. It also doesn't 
seem to have any rdepends in the archive.

A couple of more minor things:

golang-openldap-dev depends on libldap2-dev which depends on the runtime 
library, so maybe the direct dependency on libldap isn't strictly 
necessary? Just thinking of future transitions.

I'm asking maintainers to depend on libldap-dev instead of libldap2-dev 
going forward. libldap2-dev is now a transitional package and I'd like 
to drop it at some point.

Thank you,
Ryan

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package golang-openldap has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1024111

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: