[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007499: marked as done (pppconfig: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:13:41 +0000
with message-id <E1okYMf-005T24-E3@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007499: fixed in pppconfig 2.3.27
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007499,
regarding pppconfig: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007499: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007499
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: pppconfig
Version: 2.3.26
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

This package is a native package, so the likely target is 3.0 (native), not
3.0 (quilt).


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: pppconfig
Source-Version: 2.3.27
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pppconfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007499@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated pppconfig package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 22:56:21 +0200
Source: pppconfig
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.27
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007499
Changes:
 pppconfig (2.3.27) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Update to 3.0 source format (Closes: #1007499).
   * d/copyright: Convert to machine-readable format.
   * d/compat: Drop in favour of debhelper-compat.
Checksums-Sha1:
 592bce9488e6abd657daf27fab183db50da5378d 1321 pppconfig_2.3.27.dsc
 aa615abddbde512160775948bab876378aa409e2 203736 pppconfig_2.3.27.tar.xz
 6c8bc93f277c432248efa63d4212cd0bd2b1065d 6231 pppconfig_2.3.27_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 a1035205a720f27807baff552d0af66013de8670fbc5eeb6e698d56d78bd8639 1321 pppconfig_2.3.27.dsc
 5a36824ce3a79923d4833644b7ca11f0c7a5079693699d65a8d71f72b34cdcc3 203736 pppconfig_2.3.27.tar.xz
 b761ba499abc080bfb5023248c3cb143e8c54eedf57444a7b8a9da5faff6a30b 6231 pppconfig_2.3.27_source.buildinfo
Files:
 ede23f8e8516810936fc19a808da8a24 1321 admin optional pppconfig_2.3.27.dsc
 fdc8553675b6257c75c01f4e6c7469b4 203736 admin optional pppconfig_2.3.27.tar.xz
 d9604fc53c991100c25bf20c85ec4e94 6231 admin optional pppconfig_2.3.27_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wzEb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: