Processed: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?

To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Cc: team+dns@tracker.debian.org, isc-dhcp@packages.debian.org, packages@qa.debian.org
Subject: Processed: Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 20:51:05 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.B.165325243817941.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <165325243350.4672.18111734255168300165.reportbug@localhost> <165325243350.4672.18111734255168300165.reportbug@localhost>

Processing control commands:

> block -1 by 942502 942501
Bug #1011437 [src:bind9-libs] Should bind9-libs be shipped in bookworm?
1011437 was not blocked by any bugs.
1011437 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1011437: 942502 and 942501

-- 
1011437: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1011437
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

Prev by Date: razor_2.85-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by Date: Processing of commando_1.0.0-2_source.changes
Previous by thread: razor_2.85-7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Next by thread: Processing of commando_1.0.0-2_source.changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread