[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#999288: marked as done (pppconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Dec 2021 23:18:55 +0000
with message-id <E1n1zGZ-000HmI-3C@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#999288: fixed in pppconfig 2.3.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #999288,
regarding pppconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
999288: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=999288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: pppconfig
Version: 2.3.25
Severity: important
Justification: Debian Policy section 4.9
Tags: bookworm sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: missing-build-arch-indep

Dear maintainer,

Your package does not include build-arch and/or build-indep targets in
debian/rules. This is required by Debian Policy section 4.9, since 2012.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#main-building-script-debian-rules

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could benefit from a refresh. For example, packages using 'dh' cannot be
affected by this issue.

This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@ in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2021/11/msg00052.html .
The severity of this bug will be changed to 'serious' after a month.

Best,

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: pppconfig
Source-Version: 2.3.26
Done: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pppconfig, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 999288@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> (supplier of updated pppconfig package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 00:51:19 +0200
Source: pppconfig
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3.26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Closes: 999288
Changes:
 pppconfig (2.3.26) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/rules: Add build-{arch,indep}. (Closes: #999288)
Checksums-Sha1:
 55bfaaa10e5831c56408ef88946a9fe4fe2a145b 1457 pppconfig_2.3.26.dsc
 a12d7a1ed726b0ff39163c5a1b1a8fe022ad17e9 403030 pppconfig_2.3.26.tar.gz
Checksums-Sha256:
 eef0c324414388e8f753544cd627da005d9a591363e815e7eb28456938128b43 1457 pppconfig_2.3.26.dsc
 37650f98a6a8a943de2d3075d45c117857414468db5030648f5429a21ba67050 403030 pppconfig_2.3.26.tar.gz
Files:
 3eb7a23f30096768a916910e495e592e 1457 admin optional pppconfig_2.3.26.dsc
 83c9f44f5aa84a09dbb18cae193ac27e 403030 admin optional pppconfig_2.3.26.tar.gz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=cz0Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: