On Fri, 17 Sep 2021 at 10:46:31 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-08-29, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > If gnunet is built on a merged-/usr system
>
> gnunet -> ng ? ... Or should this be reassigned to gnunet?
Sorry, that was copypasta from a previously-reported bug. ng and gnunet
both have bugs of this class. This one, #993275, is about ng's use of
cp and ls. The similar bug about gnunet's use of ifconfig is #993249.
> Since ng is maintained by QA, you could upload the fix yourself, or I
> may get to it in the coming weeks...
I don't know what ng is or how to test it, only how to build it and
throw it at diffoscope, so I'm unlikely to do a QA upload.
Looking at its package tracker page, it seems to be an Emacs-style
editor with CJK input support, and hasn't had an upstream release since
2003. I have to question whether this is something we really want in
the distribution, if nobody either inside or outside Debian wants to
maintain it...
smcv
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature