Bug#969870: marked as done (tcpspy: autopkgtest should be marked superficial)
Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:23:15 +0000
with message-id <E1kIzUx-000DCI-F9@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#969870: fixed in tcpspy 1.7d-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #969870,
regarding tcpspy: autopkgtest should be marked superficial
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
969870: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969870
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tcpspy
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elbrus@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'tcpspy' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html
Examples of tests which are not significant includes (its not a
complete list):
1) Executing the binary to check version
Test-Command: foo -v
Test-Command: foo -V
Test-Command: foo --version
2) Executing the binary to check help (foo -h)
Test-Command: foo -h
Test-Command: foo --help
3) checking for files installed with 'ls'.
Test-Command: ls -l /usr/lib/*/foo.so
4) A Python or Perl library runs import foo or require Foo; but does
not attempt to use the library beyond that.
Test-Command: python3 -c "import foo"
Please add "Restrictions: superficial" to 'debian/tests/control' of
'tcpspy'.
--
Sudip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tcpspy
Source-Version: 1.7d-15
Done: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tcpspy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 969870@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org> (supplier of updated tcpspy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:28:08 -0300
Source: tcpspy
Architecture: source
Version: 1.7d-15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>
Closes: 969870
Changes:
tcpspy (1.7d-15) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* debian/control: migrated DH level to 13.
* debian/tests/control: set a CI test as superficial. (Closes: #969870)
Checksums-Sha1:
68d154eaf5942157ccf88ba053ea71e11c057ba4 1800 tcpspy_1.7d-15.dsc
253f8776718306b0728c0cef1c106ef5c98f83fa 13128 tcpspy_1.7d-15.debian.tar.xz
dd5be2fa563476ca2431291c66d05aa691106678 5677 tcpspy_1.7d-15_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
2ae76d426987d5de4caeaacc4916fb8a1d2be712c9032c3e55a5fec843a210df 1800 tcpspy_1.7d-15.dsc
e9504a4c8b22e69dc8728957b6b76cab8d48e5d1903f832d32a7a6dbf525071c 13128 tcpspy_1.7d-15.debian.tar.xz
5eff37fb6ad0293e15ef8183ab40a571fe6d897d71de69f3a5d7bd68e441095b 5677 tcpspy_1.7d-15_source.buildinfo
Files:
f325a9ec6330df486ee2460779a94959 1800 net optional tcpspy_1.7d-15.dsc
ffb0bbd94f333f527c949a45dce36ef5 13128 net optional tcpspy_1.7d-15.debian.tar.xz
209eb26ff372dd771409a64fe879834a 5677 net optional tcpspy_1.7d-15_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=cuF+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: