[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#969821: marked as done (dpatch: autopkgtest should be marked superficial)



Your message dated Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:48:41 +0000
with message-id <E1kIyxV-0008dX-UH@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#969821: fixed in dpatch 2.0.41
has caused the Debian Bug report #969821,
regarding dpatch: autopkgtest should be marked superficial
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
969821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969821
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpatch
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elbrus@debian.org

Hi,

The test done in the autopkgtest of 'dpatch' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".

Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html

Examples of tests which are not significant includes (its not a
complete list):

1) Executing the binary to check version

Test-Command: foo -v

Test-Command: foo -V

Test-Command: foo --version

2) Executing the binary to check help (foo -h)

Test-Command: foo -h

Test-Command: foo --help

3) checking for files installed with 'ls'.

Test-Command: ls -l /usr/lib/*/foo.so

4) A Python or Perl library runs import foo or require Foo; but does
not attempt to use the library beyond that.

Test-Command: python3 -c "import foo"

Please add "Restrictions: superficial" to 'debian/tests/control' of
'dpatch'.

--

Sudip 

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpatch
Source-Version: 2.0.41
Done: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpatch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 969821@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org> (supplier of updated dpatch package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:16:31 -0300
Source: dpatch
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0.41
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>
Closes: 969821
Changes:
 dpatch (2.0.41) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/control: migrated DH level to 13.
   * debian/tests/control: set a CI test as superficial. (Closes: #969821)
Checksums-Sha1:
 efd2c1dd5ae53ac97dbd1474f073d635121e5e9f 1530 dpatch_2.0.41.dsc
 8510fad9fcf6da3c16e7f02f08973d5d64a31240 69364 dpatch_2.0.41.tar.xz
 f32a16026ae65f601110afd631a995a24da5562f 5273 dpatch_2.0.41_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 09226392093eeb945be005facef5bb5d18209413cf8678e052aa40e864ec3387 1530 dpatch_2.0.41.dsc
 c4ba9dd1a2afd66d15c21154bc461856af29dec382d93119190d7145f9145c22 69364 dpatch_2.0.41.tar.xz
 786c37a3e8ba19f60e73c32af6f3994e8e15b93a2429c47555c187092ba81098 5273 dpatch_2.0.41_source.buildinfo
Files:
 a76e1352c6190f0cf5861fd3ac637dc1 1530 vcs optional dpatch_2.0.41.dsc
 73ce96372f83e1b2aa4f5f53310208e0 69364 vcs optional dpatch_2.0.41.tar.xz
 33364cac065c253176cab23abb481ffc 5273 vcs optional dpatch_2.0.41_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEENX3LDuyVoBrrofDS3mO5xwTr6e8FAl9jqnYACgkQ3mO5xwTr
6e8qhxAAlmkUq/qgnX2ijcMtKq9jR3zCYX0RC6t2hrFXuR5CouYR4SDp6/xc14hL
D0SetsGOiJjvDr3T0o+N7DbUQzrhtRhQXuXphrZzVjKfsS0MX2GdLeGAtBZIcrDG
iQOxQyNRhuhDDSLODafz9SZPj+IYJxDej51hutDgRnt1wZUcLA59QL1EXk+7J2r1
vq34LM4YA9az/mk4LkCH7fR2FpkQLtTrd+8f6VmikDGvVTUmARy5YHUfB45Cf2kw
/waDW5shpPL6m+OCOxwjr71If8wB6uJWZLGWlO7y34w2jZ+/yMwAiOMF/k5yIqYM
h6rVmPj8pzKk0kynWAEnY0Fhrp+xfShM9wj1vGrNqI9QrP2bIMPV7HRbEUsZbOZO
HKjGKOx0GvBuhG4EWaDftUfQTwGHoI7vLJT2jgI52uYIhs4nXc91iUdEkt8j/XOB
jms7W3zeffaA2JnL2vAiPE8HnuDMiePieEY/HXlt6JBF8RExRzG80p1BJZB5q9I/
UMiyges9DnYuYs6hVrgU7uogGfgfciXX9SBKtqtUeBK+7d9yg2EQ4DNURhH/p+Tv
KF/8g4FegJjhcKd/RUuEIa8xussPT9VQJfxZO2b9sZ0nMzYURy2s8FoXKtcmwWXc
AUVYFTkqC1obk9ErrO7seiKcPhtdwlZJb1GpZkdXLl63/+28ByM=
=7Gm+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: