Bug#969842: marked as done (mailcheck: autopkgtest should be marked superficial)
Your message dated Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:04:24 +0000
with message-id <E1kGs5g-0000CL-KK@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#969842: fixed in mailcheck 1.91.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #969842,
regarding mailcheck: autopkgtest should be marked superficial
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
969842: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=969842
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mailcheck
Severity: serious
Usertags: superficialtest
X-Debbugs-CC: elbrus@debian.org
Hi,
The test done in the autopkgtest of 'mailcheck' does not provide
significant test coverage and it should be marked with "Restrictions:
superficial".
Ref: https://people.debian.org/~eriberto/README.package-tests.html
Examples of tests which are not significant includes (its not a
complete list):
1) Executing the binary to check version
Test-Command: foo -v
Test-Command: foo -V
Test-Command: foo --version
2) Executing the binary to check help (foo -h)
Test-Command: foo -h
Test-Command: foo --help
3) checking for files installed with 'ls'.
Test-Command: ls -l /usr/lib/*/foo.so
4) A Python or Perl library runs import foo or require Foo; but does
not attempt to use the library beyond that.
Test-Command: python3 -c "import foo"
Please add "Restrictions: superficial" to 'debian/tests/control' of
'mailcheck'.
--
Sudip
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mailcheck
Source-Version: 1.91.2-4
Done: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mailcheck, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 969842@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> (supplier of updated mailcheck package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 23:35:47 +0100
Source: mailcheck
Architecture: source
Version: 1.91.2-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Closes: 969842
Changes:
mailcheck (1.91.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Mark autopkgtest as superficial. (Closes: #969842)
* Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0
* Update compat level to 13.
Checksums-Sha1:
a6ef0eb38fa9f38a78601d4a2492c62f4ba8c738 1757 mailcheck_1.91.2-4.dsc
e31bee99dc0609d7badd71a75030726973a07762 10860 mailcheck_1.91.2-4.debian.tar.xz
588c350cd5a355f96506caf9a5559f8ba396d270 5694 mailcheck_1.91.2-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
fd1e822b7312b75a62fbac65aa210f74b2f0e7e72b836022a515dd8e55750659 1757 mailcheck_1.91.2-4.dsc
bc257270afae891b87f177c9d3d54f628bd207bf820decc7904793777728b58c 10860 mailcheck_1.91.2-4.debian.tar.xz
f1ee750a3dab5467ef92f15831d23fe033d0461af547fcc288494cfae7e1b27e 5694 mailcheck_1.91.2-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
28f1a3d31e1bb9e5d6e14e71571bba8a 1757 mail optional mailcheck_1.91.2-4.dsc
237a1c68fc589c7005a948423c0ae9f3 10860 mail optional mailcheck_1.91.2-4.debian.tar.xz
30cd314489075ee8a9971325a74c1b43 5694 mail optional mailcheck_1.91.2-4_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=t3e2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: