[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#915146: marked as done (ioprocess: FTBFS with ld --as-needed)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2019 15:39:08 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1i1ubk-000J0z-Ke@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#935693: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #915146,
regarding ioprocess: FTBFS with ld --as-needed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
915146: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=915146
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: ioprocess
Version: 0.15.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu disco ubuntu-patch

Dear Maintainer,

ioprocess fails to build from source when the ld linker is configured to
use the --as-needed option, which requires that libraries be in a
certain order. This is the default in Ubuntu.

While this isn't strictly necessary in Debian, it puts the libraries in the
right place and will let us avoid having to maintain a delta.

In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:

  * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining changes:
    - Use LDADD instead of LDFLAGS to fix FTBFS with ld --as-needed.

Thanks for considering the patch.

Logan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers cosmic-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'cosmic-updates'), (500, 'cosmic-security'), (500, 'cosmic'), (400, 'cosmic-proposed'), (100, 'cosmic-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.18.0-11-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

diff -Nru ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/ld-as-needed.patch ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/ld-as-needed.patch
--- ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/ld-as-needed.patch	1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
+++ ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/ld-as-needed.patch	2016-01-31 23:54:06.000000000 -0500
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+Description: use LDADD instead of LDFLAGS to fix FTBFS with ld --as-needed
+Author: Logan Rosen <logan@ubuntu.com>
+Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304958
+Last-Update: 2016-02-05
+---
+This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
+--- a/src/Makefile.am
++++ b/src/Makefile.am
+@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
+ 		   $(IOPROCESS_CFLAGS) \
+ 		   $(AM_CFLAGS) \
+ 		   $(NULL)
+-ioprocess_LDFLAGS = $(GLIB2_LIBS) \
++ioprocess_LDADD = $(GLIB2_LIBS) \
+ 		    $(GTHREAD2_LIBS) \
+ 		    $(YAJL_LIBS) \
+ 		    $(AM_LDFLAGS) \
diff -Nru ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/series ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/series
--- ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/series	2016-01-18 10:37:22.000000000 -0500
+++ ioprocess-0.15.1/debian/patches/series	2018-07-11 12:57:55.000000000 -0400
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
 paths.patch
+ld-as-needed.patch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 0.15.1-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package ioprocess has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/935693

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: