[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#311825: marked as done (doc-debian-fr: Misleading name, does not include the same contents as doc-debian)

Your message dated Sun, 22 Dec 2019 07:31:36 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1iiviC-0005yb-Ox@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#947104: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #311825,
regarding doc-debian-fr: Misleading name, does not include the same contents as doc-debian
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
311825: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=311825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: doc-debian-fr
Version: 3.1.2
Priority: wishlist

The name for this package is slightly misleading, it should should provide,
for consistency, the same files as those provided by doc-debian. Even 
though it is not mandatory, most $PACKAGE-LANG packages in Debian provide 
the same content as the $PACKAGE itself.

Also, the package includes some documents translated to french even though
there are already separate packages with the french translations. This is
the case of apt-howto, maint-guide, developers-reference. Maybe these
should be removed from the package?

Notice that you could also use the same mechanisms I have recently
introduced in doc-debian's 3.1.1 package version (currently in incoming) to
auto-generate the text files that doc-debian has under doc/ based on a
local webwml copy.

As for the extra documents that doc-debian-fr provides but are not
available in doc-debian maybe you could ask the current package maintainers
to provide them in their package the english document and the translation 
and update from the CVS site. This should probably be the case for 
debian-history and policy

Regards

Javier

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3.1.3.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package doc-debian-fr has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/947104

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: