[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#589171: marked as done (core/view.py: DeprecationWarning)



Your message dated Wed, 25 Sep 2019 05:04:39 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1iCzTj-000Fm0-3o@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#941066: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #589171,
regarding core/view.py: DeprecationWarning
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
589171: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: python-toscawidgets
Version: 0.9.7.2-1
Severity: normal

Hello, and thanks for maintaning ToscaWidgets.

It seems that python2.6 raises a DeprecationWarning in ToscaWidgets
code:

  enrico@viaza:~/dev/cfget$ nosetests
  /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/tw/core/view.py:223: DeprecationWarning: object.__new__() takes no parameters
    obj = object.__new__(cls, *args, **kw)
  ..........
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Ran 10 tests in 0.029s
  
  OK

<despair>
It is interesting to note that the warning is triggered when running
nosetests on cfget, which is a tiny little script of one single file
that doesn't use anything outside of the normal python standard library.

Oh, well, even when just running nosetests --help:
  $ nosetests --help
  /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/tw/core/view.py:223: DeprecationWarning: object.__new__() takes no parameters
    obj = object.__new__(cls, *args, **kw)
    Usage: nosetests [options]

I have no idea what went through the mind of whoever designed things so
that a DeprecationWarning in ToscaWidgets would show in such conditions,
but oh my god there is so much wrong accumulating in the Python
ecosystem that every day is a new experience in setting a new low.

This has nothing to do with this bug, though.
</despair>


Ciao,

Enrico

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages python-toscawidgets depends on:
ii  python-formencode             1.2.2-1    validation and form generation Pyt
ii  python-simplejson             2.1.1-1    simple, fast, extensible JSON enco
ii  python-support                1.0.9      automated rebuilding support for P
ii  python-webob                  0.9.8-1    Python module providing WSGI reque

python-toscawidgets recommends no packages.

Versions of packages python-toscawidgets suggests:
ii  python-cheetah                2.4.2.1-1  text-based template engine and Pyt
ii  python-genshi                 0.6-1      Python XML-based template engine
ii  python-kid                    0.9.6-2    simple Pythonic template language 

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.7.2-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package python-toscawidgets has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/941066

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: