Bug#874950: New version stable?
(CC previous sponsor as well)
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Diego,
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:32 AM Shengjing Zhu <zhsj@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 01:09:00 -0300 Diego Sarzi <diegosarzi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thank you Shenging Zhy for the contribution.
> > >
> > > Can you tell me how is the stability of keepassx with its modifications,
> > > referring to QT4 for QT5?
> > >
> > > Can we use it for the unstable version?
> > >
> >
> > Hi, I see you adopt this package. That's great.
> >
> > I don't know the stability. But I have used this version after I
> > uploaded it experimental, and didn't have any problem.
>
> As keepassx will be removed from testing at 02 Sept, what's the plan
> for you to upload the qt5 version? Do you need sponsor? I'm glad to
> help.
>
This bug is RC and keepassx will be removed in 2 days.
But I haven't received your response.
So I'm going to NMU keepassx in DELAY/2-day, please tell me I should
cancel it or speed it up.
The full changelog can be seen at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/keepassx/compare/8da06bb...66024d9
Thanks.
--
Shengjing Zhu
Reply to: