[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#919850: marked as done (python3-link-grammar: broken symlink: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/linkgrammar/_clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1)

Your message dated Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:31:41 +0100
with message-id <155091790172.28369.4818784285842210299@auryn.jones.dk>
and subject line Re: python3-link-grammar: broken symlink: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/linkgrammar/_clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #919850,
regarding python3-link-grammar: broken symlink: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/linkgrammar/_clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
919850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: python3-link-grammar
Version: 5.5.1-5
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

1m41.0s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
  /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/linkgrammar/_clinkgrammar.so -> _clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1 (python3-link-grammar)

But there is 

  /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/linkgrammar/_clinkgrammar.so.5.5.1

so this seems to be a site-packages/dist-packages mixup.


cheers,

Andreas

Attachment: python3-link-grammar_5.5.1-5.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 5.5.1-6

Seems this was an issue with build-environment: There was no such issue 
with the release built yesterday (which didn't change those parts of the 
code).

Tagging as fixed in the release from yesterday just to be on the safe 
side, although I believe the previous release was fine as well.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: