Bug#921527: cuneiform_1.1.0+dfsg-7 - FTBFS on ppc64el
Hi,
Sorry - I am not proposing a patch (may have write a bad bug header).
My point is that test is failing on ppc64el as it was failing sometime
ago on other platform apparently. As such I was expecting you had an
idea why on ppc64el the fixes are not accurate (or not sufficient). -
Going to investigate on what was done on ubuntu side as it was
mentionned to be fixed there.
Thanks
On 07/02/2019 13:44, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> We currently have no ppc64el binaries for cuneiform, so this is not a
> regressions and therefore not RC.
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 14:50:47 +0100 "Thierry Fauck@linux.ibm.com"
> <thierry@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> --- images/phototest.tif.txt 2011-04-19 12:49:57.000000000 +0000
>> +++ /tmp/cuneiform.test.KgXcP8dD/phototest.tif.out 2018-01-14 03:21:46.536688277 +0000
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> -This is a lot of 12 point text to test the
>> -ocr code and see if it works on all types
>> +This is a lot of 12 poiet text to test the
>> +ocr code aed see if it works oe all types
>> of file format.
> Wouldn't that patch break the test for all platforms where it currently
> passes?
>
> Andreas
>
--
Thierry Fauck @ fr.ibm.com
Reply to: