[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#737491: marked as done (eterm: takes 100% CPU time)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2018 14:16:49 +0200
with message-id <b74586ac-1814-f69b-5257-2afe4c2b329f@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: eterm: takes 100% CPU time
has caused the Debian Bug report #737491,
regarding eterm: takes 100% CPU time
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
737491: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=737491
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: eterm
Version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

currently Eterm takes 100% CPU time of one core after being executed.

Thanks for your efforts.

With many greetings,

Adrian Immanuel KIESS



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages eterm depends on:
ii  libast2            0.7-6+b1
ii  libc6              2.17-97
ii  libfreetype6       2.5.2-1
ii  libice6            2:1.0.8-2
ii  libimlib2          1.4.6-2
ii  libsm6             2:1.2.1-2
ii  libx11-6           2:1.6.2-1
ii  libxext6           2:1.3.2-1
ii  multiarch-support  2.17-97
ii  zlib1g             1:1.2.8.dfsg-1

eterm recommends no packages.

eterm suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

I am reviewing eterm bugs, and this bug is the same that bug number
770369, which was closed in version 0.9.6-4.

Regards,
José A.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: