Bug#834577: needs more work
lamby wrote:
> I believe there is a typo in debian/rules:
>
> override_dh_autoconfigure -> override_dh_auto_configure
>
> Patch attached.
I'm afraid your patch is 0 bytes long.
If what you intended is the obvious one character change, then plugwash tried
it in #897114:
} The only tricky bit was that there seems to have been a typo in
} debian/rules, there was a target called override_dh_autoconfigure which I
} presume was a typo for override_dh_autoconfigure , I tried fixing said
} typo but that seemed to cause more problems than it solved, so I left it
} alone and added my own override target. You might want to consider either
} fixing or removing the dead code.
Thus, it would need more attention at than my drive-by QA upload to fix the
FTBFS has tuits allotted for.
Meow!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Certified airhead; got the CT scan to prove that!
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀
Reply to: