[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#815632: marked as done (gnubiff: Fails to read config at startup)

Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:05:18 +0000
with message-id <E1e5eTm-0008Gt-0a@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#815632: fixed in gnubiff 2.2.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #815632,
regarding gnubiff: Fails to read config at startup
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
815632: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: gnubiff
Version: 2.2.15-4
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

With 2.2.16-1, gnubiff fails to load the config at startup, with the error:
** (gnubiff:5100): WARNING **: Configuration file () not found!
Settings are then all default.

With 2.2.15-4, all is fine.

Giving the path to the file "gnubiff -c /home/user1/.gnubiffrc" does not help.

With strace, I see (no option given):
- 1st try: open("\270\10[\te/user1/.gnubiffrc", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
- 2nd try: open("\20\210\301\te/user1/.gnubiffrc",
O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
- 3rd try: open("08h\te/user1/.gnubiffrc", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory)
which looks like a string buffer being overwritten.

Looking at the code, I followed to Options::value_string in
options.cc, but the code hasn't changed between 2.2.15-4 and 2.2.16-1
(no code has changed, actually)
I couldn't locate the dbg package to dig deeper with gdb.

Thanks!
Omen


-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers oldoldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.51-xps (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages gnubiff depends on:
ii  dpkg                 1.18.4
ii  gconf-service        3.2.6-3
ii  install-info         6.1.0.dfsg.1-2
ii  libatk1.0-0          2.16.0-2
ii  libc6                2.21-7
ii  libcairo-gobject2    1.14.2-2
ii  libcairo2            1.14.2-2
ii  libfam0              2.7.0-17.1+b1
ii  libgcc1              1:5.3.1-9
ii  libgconf-2-4         3.2.6-3
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0   2.31.5-1
ii  libglib2.0-0         2.46.2-3
ii  libgtk-3-0           3.16.6-1
pn  libpanel-applet-4-0  <none>
ii  libpango-1.0-0       1.38.1-1
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0  1.38.1-1
ii  libpopt0             1.16-10
ii  libssl1.0.0          1.0.2d-1
ii  libstdc++6           5.3.1-9
ii  libx11-6             2:1.6.3-1
ii  sox                  14.4.1-5

Versions of packages gnubiff recommends:
pn  fam  <none>

gnubiff suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: gnubiff
Source-Version: 2.2.17-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnubiff, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 815632@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> (supplier of updated gnubiff package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 21:42:32 +0200
Source: gnubiff
Binary: gnubiff
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.17-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Description:
 gnubiff    - mail notification program for GNOME (and others)
Closes: 815632
Changes:
 gnubiff (2.2.17-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * New upstream release.
     + Fixes failure to read config file.  (Closes: #815632)
   * dh compat 10.
   * Prune stone age versioned dependencies.
   * Drop patches applied upstream.
Checksums-Sha1:
 85b5b8f8ebdd28f6023c814073a67ab05bf45c4b 1893 gnubiff_2.2.17-1.dsc
 c9826a3c71822ae73368ed3e2a60b43780c4ee85 897817 gnubiff_2.2.17.orig.tar.gz
 7da71dd62c976f87366190f46f99e8640cc3ef05 9372 gnubiff_2.2.17-1.debian.tar.xz
 c4cab67d75c65ab43b5ea5b1efc0bf062ec99d18 6160 gnubiff_2.2.17-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 12a8eebb5979243a98cdf88852053f4dabf7383e95bea6d92c802d8331207ff3 1893 gnubiff_2.2.17-1.dsc
 e616ab031d493e4b9b27a2bccc810e4b2ada912b3cf8d44f39325cbc5293fb2c 897817 gnubiff_2.2.17.orig.tar.gz
 74e65ce5e6477d60ec5854ef35342d16884e3dc628271c31c4debee2a0dbc430 9372 gnubiff_2.2.17-1.debian.tar.xz
 b55e0c5efe2a12bdd987dd8063e235e894f60c16fa0d7e5188eb0934ad0447f3 6160 gnubiff_2.2.17-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 0d9898801b581aebc95d784a9c793e2a 1893 mail optional gnubiff_2.2.17-1.dsc
 6371ca2986efdaf1e47bc5a44249513a 897817 mail optional gnubiff_2.2.17.orig.tar.gz
 aae567f6d7b46c8ce11f5a9d344f30bd 9372 mail optional gnubiff_2.2.17-1.debian.tar.xz
 9b44e8c0caf8c1c6d7467cf78597eb88 6160 mail optional gnubiff_2.2.17-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=KDff
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: