[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#629848: marked as done (ripole not ripOLE)



Your message dated Mon, 28 Aug 2017 03:49:33 +0000
with message-id <E1dmB3N-0005rl-65@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#629848: fixed in ripole 0.2.0+20081101.0215-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #629848,
regarding ripole not ripOLE
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
629848: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629848
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ripole
Version: 0.2.0+20081101.0215-1
Severity: wishlist

$ ripole
ripOLE -i <OLE2 file> [ -d <directory> ] [--save-unknown-streams]
[--version|-V] [--verbose|-v] [--debug] [--help|-h]

Say
Usage: ripole ...

Not
ripOLE ...



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ripole
Source-Version: 0.2.0+20081101.0215-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ripole, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 629848@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl> (supplier of updated ripole package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 05:28:26 +0200
Source: ripole
Binary: ripole
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.0+20081101.0215-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Description:
 ripole     - Extract attachments from OLE2 data files (ie, MS Office docs)
Closes: 629848 853644
Changes:
 ripole (0.2.0+20081101.0215-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Lowercase program's name in a help message. (Closes: #629848)
   * Fix a FTBFS due to a missing dereference. (Closes: #853644)
Checksums-Sha1:
 3421068412ee4f5a90a5cc0faedc6d59c46b9ebf 1444 ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4.dsc
 66c711e34e925b2fb6dced449a94c70c3b6232e9 4608 ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4.debian.tar.xz
 8031358c904c1b14dbf92535d64866d58b25b81e 5307 ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c9e3e2c9d9543aae730bb111c4a4e7691f63896059c4a662d425cbf317f0dfe8 1444 ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4.dsc
 ca8d20aa11c06e297010f5dacef43b645b14fd43f19a78158c3ed7eabb84361d 4608 ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4.debian.tar.xz
 33c534c3372556c77be2a19c11d5848221d3482408c0f515967ad1eb83107f54 5307 ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 1091293269c7e8884054bcc674fdd44a 1444 utils optional ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4.dsc
 28ef2b97b6abe010e651a8640e42e9f3 4608 utils optional ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4.debian.tar.xz
 3500332d21451a9533a3cb42da0a8879 5307 utils optional ripole_0.2.0+20081101.0215-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE/Zzi2Nd1S3irJ5u9LDtDb+rGgQEFAlmjj0IACgkQLDtDb+rG
gQFnbwf/Qef6hrgin+6qORKJc2jLJcFoNA2Y0cb2Z498IdSQzhFe/NeQyvPz4pm8
6EbZcVaqMioelRxJAGkiW4V9iwoMaHbdrKDSKh9qGoenPuvnBfGVj0f15u0wpGqR
CzYSxH8QnJDOxLhMyFCxJJbTeokUuxvxaQqPFc5zBS0pElwxHLpqDKVK2uUwogma
CRSuhkgScGL3mUko0aGtZsrUh1qlfa69rtDejFkbt/CTweLsXSkYuDM4jmfFyAUP
8jh6njb3l/PG/Ttl75ax2oADZcr7C3u3M5swlJuLqu8Tg0OsQvabvcOxuOVNGoP0
SRhZ65JqOsXVg/IEQPtNvF13XCd2lg==
=l79W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: