also sprach Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [2017-01-16 18:30 +1100]: > > I think it'd be best to compare against the average of the load > > level of all available batteries. > > Sounds good enough. > > One could argue that only the battery with the highest level > should be checked, but this might assume certain features in the > hardware that can't be guaranteed, so above will be safe. acpitool or upower should expose combined data. > If you change something here, I will no longer be able to easily > test it, because I no longer have an external battery for my > laptop. I could, but I am not ready to touch the code. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems a common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof was to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -- douglas adams, "mostly harmless"
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)