[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#865576: Fwd: Bug#865576: guilt FTBFS with git 2.13.1: test failures [origin: bunk@debian.org]



On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 08:58:17 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> I'm not sure if you've already seen this bug report against guilt in
> Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/865576

I haven't.  Thanks for forwarding it to me.

> But since I saw no new commits since the release of Git 2.13.1 (or
> 2.13) and the last test-suite related fix was in February 2016, I
> assume that non of the commits since 0.36 already fix this.

Right.  I'm hoping that it's just git being better at cleaning up empty
directories in .git/refs and the guilt refression suite asserting a slightly
different git behavior.

> Seems as if you need at least to update your test suite to work with
> the latest git releases, but maybe more

There may be more issues with 2.13, but based on the failure output in this
bug report, guilt should still work.  (Obviously, the regression suite needs
to be fixed.)

Jeff.

> ----- Forwarded message from Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> -----
> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 23:51:23 +0300
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
> Subject: Bug#865576: guilt FTBFS with git 2.13.1: test failures
> Reply-To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>, 865576@bugs.debian.org
> 
> Source: guilt
> Version: 0.36-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: buster sid
> 
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/guilt.html
> 
> ...
> 
> ./run-tests
> 010: done.
> 011: done.
> 020: --- t-020.out	2015-11-11 19:18:31.000000000 +0000
> +++ /tmp/guilt.log.5484	2017-06-22 20:31:00.036043499 +0000
> @@ -228,7 +228,6 @@
>  d .git/patches
>  d .git/patches/master
>  d .git/refs/patches
> -d .git/refs/patches/master
>  f 22930c6d1f1938f298a4fca51c57e4b47171db21  .git/patches/master/mode
>  f 413390f3906f16f30b054a4fb86c1e014b964504  .git/patches/master/remove
>  f 9c18cc7abe6b87f18503714a80a677b4094eb457  .git/patches/master/add
> @@ -243,7 +242,6 @@
>  d .git/patches
>  d .git/patches/master
>  d .git/refs/patches
> -d .git/refs/patches/master
>  f 22930c6d1f1938f298a4fca51c57e4b47171db21  .git/patches/master/mode
>  f 413390f3906f16f30b054a4fb86c1e014b964504  .git/patches/master/remove
>  f 9c18cc7abe6b87f18503714a80a677b4094eb457  .git/patches/master/add
> @@ -258,7 +256,6 @@
>  d .git/patches
>  d .git/patches/master
>  d .git/refs/patches
> -d .git/refs/patches/master
>  f 22930c6d1f1938f298a4fca51c57e4b47171db21  .git/patches/master/mode
>  f 413390f3906f16f30b054a4fb86c1e014b964504  .git/patches/master/remove
>  f 9c18cc7abe6b87f18503714a80a677b4094eb457  .git/patches/master/add
> @@ -357,7 +354,6 @@
>  d .git/patches
>  d .git/patches/master
>  d .git/refs/patches
> -d .git/refs/patches/master
>  f 22930c6d1f1938f298a4fca51c57e4b47171db21  .git/patches/master/mode
>  f 413390f3906f16f30b054a4fb86c1e014b964504  .git/patches/master/remove
>  f 9c18cc7abe6b87f18503714a80a677b4094eb457  .git/patches/master/add
> @@ -478,7 +474,6 @@
>  d .git/patches
>  d .git/patches/master
>  d .git/refs/patches
> -d .git/refs/patches/master
>  f 0803c721968056410df61400bb239380d033b9d5  .git/patches/master/empty.patch~
>  f 22930c6d1f1938f298a4fca51c57e4b47171db21  .git/patches/master/mode
>  f 413390f3906f16f30b054a4fb86c1e014b964504  .git/patches/master/remove
> Test failed!
> 
> Test:		020
> Log file:	/tmp/guilt.log.5484
> Repo dir:	"/tmp/guilt reg.14476"
> 
> Makefile:2: recipe for target 'all' failed
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 1
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> 		Regards, Axel
> -- 
>  ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
> : :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
> `. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
>   `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

-- 
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
that.
		- Linus Torvalds


Reply to: