[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#859549: marked as done (partimage: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster)

Your message dated Sat, 01 Jul 2017 11:20:46 +0000
with message-id <E1dRGSE-0003O3-Gv@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#859549: fixed in partimage 0.6.9-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #859549,
regarding partimage: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
859549: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=859549
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: partimage
Version: 0.6.8-3
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1

Hi,

OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released.  During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build.  A log of that build can be found at:
https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/partimage_0.6.8-3_amd64-20160529-1504

On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the
reasons why it might fail.  There are also updated man pages at
https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information.

There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent
snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works.

If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us.


Kurt

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: partimage
Source-Version: 0.6.9-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partimage, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 859549@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> (supplier of updated partimage package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2017 13:50:34 +0300
Source: partimage
Binary: partimage-server partimage
Architecture: source
Version: 0.6.9-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
Description:
 partimage  - backup partitions into a compressed image file
 partimage-server - server to use partimage across a network
Closes: 859549
Changes:
 partimage (0.6.9-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Apply patch from Chris West to build with OpenSSL 1.1
     (Closes: #859549)
Checksums-Sha1:
 7ed7da53addd38ab3bdf8fdf3e2a59ebed72b293 1927 partimage_0.6.9-5.dsc
 a74e959cdd9dc004a3b2370eab7fcca9ce415f20 16476 partimage_0.6.9-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 045282ba9b94e48d877218ed276a58bd685128ee0253372bf220475c48dfe78d 1927 partimage_0.6.9-5.dsc
 bb5f41db73c768f6efdf4079bd0f0de5f41acbc576166d56a39aa5f18cec0698 16476 partimage_0.6.9-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 d9034a1e693cc726e21de0fc9e1c16f1 1927 admin optional partimage_0.6.9-5.dsc
 95e845e03d475049ac0ec797cc302b71 16476 admin optional partimage_0.6.9-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=DPnG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: