[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#608381: marked as done (expect dependency unnecessary for all use cases of courier-authlib)

Your message dated Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:37:18 +0200
with message-id <a6083cec-8ade-d7c2-9af6-66978c92e346@datahouse.ch>
and subject line Re: Bug#608381: expect dependency unnecessary for all use cases of courier-authlib
has caused the Debian Bug report #608381,
regarding expect dependency unnecessary for all use cases of courier-authlib
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
608381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: courier-authlib
Severity: minor

Hi,

In #400812, expect was added because of some file that was apparently
previously broken without it. That whole thing seems to be relevant only
for the functionality of changing the password from SqWebMail (per
documentation at http://www.courier-mta.org/authlib/README_authlib.html)
while using a traditional passwd back-end. I'm not sure how popular that
is among other courier-authlib users, but it's definitely unnecessary
when pulled in via maildrop, so could you at least demote this Depends
relationship to a Recommends, please?

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Control: fixed -1 0.66.4-5

Hi,

Ondrej has taken care of this already in commit
badbdc233d7addf880264e44ea1a1ba314cdc4b6, which first appeared in 0.66.4-5.

Kind Regards

Markus Wanner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: