also sprach Thomas Arendsen Hein <thomas@intevation.de> [2017-01-16 18:30 +1100]:
> > I think it'd be best to compare against the average of the load
> > level of all available batteries.
>
> Sounds good enough.
>
> One could argue that only the battery with the highest level
> should be checked, but this might assume certain features in the
> hardware that can't be guaranteed, so above will be safe.
acpitool or upower should expose combined data.
> If you change something here, I will no longer be able to easily
> test it, because I no longer have an external battery for my
> laptop.
I could, but I am not ready to touch the code.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft
: :' : proud Debian developer
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
a common mistake that people make
when trying to design something completely foolproof
was to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
-- douglas adams, "mostly harmless"
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital GPG signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)