[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#846113: marked as done (polygraph loses SSL support when compiled with OpenSSL 1.1)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Dec 2016 19:52:20 +0000
with message-id <E1cIL1o-0009sZ-3i@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#846113: fixed in polygraph 4.3.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #846113,
regarding polygraph loses SSL support when compiled with OpenSSL 1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
846113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846113
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: polygraph
Version: 4.3.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Control: block 827061 by -1

...
checking for CRYPTO_lock in -lcrypto... no
checking for CRYPTO_add_lock in -lcrypto... no
...

Not a perfect solution but an option for stretch is the patch below to 
use OpenSSL 1.0.2

The "| libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~)" is added for backports.

--- debian/control.old	2016-11-28 11:13:51.000000000 +0000
+++ debian/control	2016-11-28 11:13:57.000000000 +0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  debhelper (>= 9),
  dh-autoreconf,
  libncurses5-dev,
- libssl-dev,
+ libssl1.0-dev | libssl-dev (<< 1.1.0~),
  zlib1g-dev,
 Standards-Version: 3.9.8
 Homepage: http://www.web-polygraph.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: polygraph
Source-Version: 4.3.2-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
polygraph, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 846113@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org> (supplier of updated polygraph package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 19:25:57 +0000
Source: polygraph
Binary: polygraph
Architecture: source
Version: 4.3.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>
Description:
 polygraph  - performance testing tool for caching proxies and more
Closes: 846113
Changes:
 polygraph (4.3.2-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Build with libssl 1.0.2 until upstream supports 1.1.0.
     Patch from Adrian Bunk. (Closes: #846113)
Checksums-Sha1:
 46b36017156b22b2e280310d2a39ad6f0d09a628 1802 polygraph_4.3.2-5.dsc
 9c2a1b1755e7bf31c47be2a0f28edc385890b184 6240 polygraph_4.3.2-5.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 8619bbe4518efb7c9d7b8d1103ec6f25f14885c60e456085540f064c31aae94e 1802 polygraph_4.3.2-5.dsc
 408c8d3c46f6089a50107b93d97a486399291b23e7bcf4cf5228be10d844422f 6240 polygraph_4.3.2-5.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 da46e19c17a04b2109f89be60e65ef34 1802 net optional polygraph_4.3.2-5.dsc
 9c558544565c2aeda42e675564790501 6240 net optional polygraph_4.3.2-5.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wVaW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: