Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:34:30 +0200 (CEST) with message-id <alpine.DEB.2.11.1608070132140.4467@tulipan.isla-invisible.es> and subject line Re: starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)? has caused the Debian Bug report #555279, regarding starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 555279: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555279 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)?
- From: Barry deFreese <bdefreese@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:34:46 -0500
- Message-id: <4AF77FC6.20505@debian.org>
- Reply-to: bdefreese@debian.org
Package: starvoyager Version: 0.4.4-5 Severity: important User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: proposed-orphan Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: * Inactive upstream. * Possibly inactive maintainer, last upload 2005. (Non-DD, not in MIA). * A few un-answered bugs. If you think that it should be removed from Debian instead of being orphaned, please reply to this bug and tell so. If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues. Also, you can study the possibility of taking co-maintainers. If you agree that it should be orphaned, send the following commands to control@bugs.debian.org (replace nnnnnn with this bug's number): severity nnnnnn normal reassign nnnnnn wnpp retitle nnnnnn O: <packagename> -- <short package description> thanks If you think it should be removed, send the following commands instead: severity nnnnnn normal reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons> thanks For more information, see http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-archive-manip http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Thank you, Barry deFreese Debian QA
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Barry deFreese <bdefreese@debian.org>
- Cc: 555279-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: starvoyager: Should this package be orphaned (or removed)?
- From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 01:34:30 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1608070132140.4467@tulipan.isla-invisible.es>
- In-reply-to: <4AF77FC6.20505@debian.org>
- References: <4AF77FC6.20505@debian.org>
This package was effectively orphaned: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831806 which I think answers adequately the question asked in this bug report. Thanks.
--- End Message ---