Bug#825448: marked as done (regexxer: Please switch to gtk-update-icon-cache)
Your message dated Thu, 26 May 2016 22:41:33 +0000
with message-id <E1b63y9-0005mU-2l@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#825448: fixed in regexxer 0.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #825448,
regarding regexxer: Please switch to gtk-update-icon-cache
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
825448: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: regexxer
Version: 0.10-1
Severity: normal
User: pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: gtk-update-icon-cache
Hi,
historically, Debian shipped two gtk-update-icon-cache variants: One
built from src:gtk+2.0 and shipped in libgtk2.0-bin as
/usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache and another one from src:gtk+3.0 which is
shipped in libgtk-3-bin as /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache-3.0.
Those binaries don't actually have any dependencies on libgtk and they
produce the same result, so there is no good reason to ship two
implementations.
We therefor decided to only ship one implementation which is built from
src:gtk+3.0 and shipped in a separate, new binary package named
"gtk-update-icon-cache" [1]. The libgtk2.0-bin package no longer
provides /usr/bin/gtk-update-icon-cache [2].
Your package regexxer declares a build-dependency and/or dependency on
libgtk2.0-bin. If this dependency was added to get the icon cache
utility, please (build-)depend on the new gtk-update-icon-cache package
instead.
If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Regards,
Michael
[1] https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+3.0/news/20160522T180043Z.html
[2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gtk+2.0/news/20160522T222333Z.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: regexxer
Source-Version: 0.10-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
regexxer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 825448@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> (supplier of updated regexxer package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:28:44 +0200
Source: regexxer
Binary: regexxer
Architecture: source
Version: 0.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>
Description:
regexxer - visual search and replace tool
Closes: 825448
Changes:
regexxer (0.10-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* QA upload.
* Switch libgtk2.0-bin Build-Depends to gtk-update-icon-cache.
(Closes: #825448)
Checksums-Sha1:
1ba465df9544a1e9f52654e09ef287818a14f818 1810 regexxer_0.10-2.dsc
43c8c508c8355897d49b28c3878953ae429886fe 4748 regexxer_0.10-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
e12f92670c482646348769b4525038a9e75895f9f2f96d5ba845e4d3af993ba9 1810 regexxer_0.10-2.dsc
afd82c2bed1eda84ee78def20bbfba12176f6bb61d81af307a0778a3cdf89eb9 4748 regexxer_0.10-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
a0d4ac364725947f27dee8186ae306a1 1810 devel optional regexxer_0.10-2.dsc
d8f1ee04e6dd2fb216f63b1c5b3b6d2d 4748 devel optional regexxer_0.10-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=muFR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: