[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#504197: marked as done (No support in alien for 64-bit s390 packages)



Your message dated Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:23:53 -0500
with message-id <1457555033.1279110.544560570.6C739A0D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
and subject line Closing 504197 -- obsolete
has caused the Debian Bug report #504197,
regarding No support in alien for 64-bit s390 packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
504197: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504197
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: alien
Version: 8.64

Other Linux distributions, such as Redhat and Suse, treat the 64-bit IBM
mainframe architecture (s390x) as a completely separate architecture from
the 32-bit IBM mainframe architecture (s390).  Debian treats the 64-bit
IBM mainframe architecture as an extension of the s390 architecture.
64-bit IBM mainframe packages are usually distinguished as such in some
way in their package name, such as the use of s390x or 64.  For example,

linux-image-2.6.26-1-s390x

or

lib64gcc1

but the package FILE name still ends with "_s390.deb".  For example,

linux-image-2.6.26-1-s390x_2.6.26-8_s390.deb

or

lib64gcc1_4.3.2-1_s390.deb

Alien appears to have no support for this.  It does not recognize s390x
specified in rpm packages as valid for the Debian s390 architecture,
does not recognize the format of many 64-bit format packages, such as
shared libraries (.so files), etc.

(Note: you may see s390 identified in the literature as 31-bit.  There
is some confusion on this topic.  The s390 architecture uses 32-bit registers
for binary integer arithmetic, but the addressing is limited to 31 bits.
Whether the architecture is 31-bit or 32-bit depends on how you look at it.
For System z, both the registers and the addressing are 64-bits, but it does
have a 32-bit compatibility mode.)

Note: although I have reported this bug against version 8.64, I don't see a
fixed bug report against 8.72 which describes this problem; so I wouldn't
be surprised if version 8.72 has this problem too.

--




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing bug report -- obsolete.

-- 
  .''`.     Stephen Powell    <zlinuxman@fastmail.com>
 : :'  :
 `. `'`
   `-

--- End Message ---

Reply to: