I'm sorry, what should i have write on the changelog instead? I thought the creation of watch file didn't need a detailed changelog because its purpose is always the same and the only difference would be the regex, watch version and url, also the changes would easily be recognizable because the file didn't exist before, should've detailed/explained the watch entirely?
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/fte now claims that there is a new
upstream release while there isn't.
fte upstream has the annoying behaviour to _not_ put the version
number but the release date into the tar ball file names which is why
there never has been a watch file in the past. See
/usr/share/doc/fte/changelog.gz:
Wow, that was a very silly mistake. I think i didn't pay attention to uscan output when testing the watch file, I won't let this happen again.
I'm tempted to do another QA upload to fix this false positive. The
other option would be to either remove the watch file or the comment
out its content.
Thanks for fixing my mistake.