[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#811899: gnuift: FTBFS with GCC 6: declared in this scope



Package: gnuift
Version: 0.1.14-12.1
Severity: important
User: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-not-declared

This package fails to build with GCC 6.  GCC 6 has not been released
yet, but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for
stretch.

Note that only the first error is reported; there might be more.  You
can find a snapshot of GCC 6 in experimental.  To build with GCC 6,
you can set CC=gcc-6 CXX=g++-6 explicitly.

You may be able to find out more about this issue at
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html

> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.67.0 (26 Dec 2015) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux
...
> checking if we can embed a Perl interpreter into GIFT... perl-compile-test-program.cc: In function 'void xs_init()':
> perl-compile-test-program.cc:67:16: warning: ISO C++ forbids converting a string constant to 'char*' [-Wwrite-strings]
>    char *file = __FILE__;
>                 ^~~~~~~~
> 
> In file included from perl-compile-test-program.cc:41:0:
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.22/CORE/perl.h:166:16: error: 'my_perl' was not declared in this scope
>  #  define aTHX my_perl
>                 ^
> 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.22/CORE/perl.h:179:18: note: in expansion of macro 'aTHX'
>  #  define aTHX_  aTHX,
>                   ^~~~
> 
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.22/CORE/embed.h:419:34: note: in expansion of macro 'aTHX_'
>  #define newXS(a,b,c)  Perl_newXS(aTHX_ a,b,c)
>                                   ^~~~~
> 
> perl-compile-test-program.cc:71:3: note: in expansion of macro 'newXS'
>    newXS("DynaLoader::boot_DynaLoader", boot_DynaLoader, file);
>    ^~~~~
> 
> perl-compile-test-program.cc: In function 'void test()':
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.22/CORE/perl.h:166:16: error: 'my_perl' was not declared in this scope
>  #  define aTHX my_perl
>                 ^

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
Linux for HPE Helion, Hewlett Packard Enterprise


Reply to: