[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#566137: marked as done (lynx vs. lynx-cur)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:37:53 +0100
with message-id <20150117123753.GB1234@downhill.g.la>
and subject line Re: Bug#566137: lynx vs. lynx-cur
has caused the Debian Bug report #566137,
regarding lynx vs. lynx-cur
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
566137: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566137
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lynx-cur
Version: 2.8.7dev9-2.1

The Description says:
  This package contains a development version of lynx.  For a
  known-stable version, please see the lynx package instead.

However, the "lynx" package in lenny is a transitional package which
says to use "lynx-cur".

Ian.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 2.8.7dev12-1

On 2010-01-21 Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Package: lynx-cur
> Version: 2.8.7dev9-2.1

> The Description says:
>   This package contains a development version of lynx.  For a
>   known-stable version, please see the lynx package instead.

> However, the "lynx" package in lenny is a transitional package which
> says to use "lynx-cur".

Hello,

this was fixed in 2009 the bug was not closed:

lynx-cur (2.8.7dev12-1) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
  * Fixed Description, i.e. removed reference to lynx.  (Closes: #509929)
[...]
 -- Atsuhito KOHDA <kohda@debian.org>  Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:48:55 +0900

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

--- End Message ---
Reply to: