On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:30:23PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: mt-st > > It is not clear what the impact would be, but I think it would be > easier to maintain this package if the mtio.h copy would not be used > and instead the system installed one would be used instead. Thanks for the report. > Here are the diff (as of today on wheezy): > > $ diff -u mtio.h /usr/include/linux/mtio.h > --- mtio.h 2008-02-20 20:31:49.000000000 +0100 > +++ /usr/include/linux/mtio.h 2014-01-11 01:15:51.000000000 +0100 > @@ -1,9 +1,8 @@ > /* > * linux/mtio.h header file for Linux. Written by H. Bergman > * > - * Sanitized version for mt/stinit (definitions not used by these > - * programs have been removed) 7 Oct 2007/Kai Mäkisara This is the part that makes me a bit suspicious - maybe there was more to using a local file than including directly (unlikely, but…). I'll try to ping the upstream, if he's still active, and get more info. But yes, using the kernel header and build-depending on linux-libc-dev makes sense. thanks, iustin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature