Your message dated Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:33:20 +0000 with message-id <E1XwIU4-00060A-Rj@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#771952: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #430545, regarding cdebconf: display corruption with multiselect during pkgsel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 430545: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=430545 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian BTS Submit <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: cdebconf-newt-udeb: display corruption with multiselect over progress bar
- From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 18:52:15 +0100
- Message-id: <200711021852.25714.elendil@planet.nl>
Package: cdebconf-newt-udeb Version: 0.125 As shown in the screenshots debconf_displcorr1 and debconf_displcorr2 at http://people.debian.org/~fjp/tmp/d-i/, there is some display corruption when the XOrg screen resolution multiselect dialog is displayed on top of a progress bar. After the dialog, the progress bar remains corrupted. The display is OK again after the progress bar is stopped. The corruption is only present if the installer is booted with vga=791, not with the normal resolution. I can reproduce this reliably when installing in VirtualBox. If you swap between the the 1 and 2 images, it can be seen that the corruption is caused by remnants of the other dialog; i.e. it looks like the screen is not completely repainted for some reason. As can be seen from debconf_displcorr1_etch, this problem did not yet exist in Etch. Possibly this is not a cdebconf bug, but an issue in newt (or maybe even elsewhere). cdebconf seems most likely though. Cheers, FJPAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 336764-done@bugs.debian.org,369389-done@bugs.debian.org,404450-done@bugs.debian.org,430545-done@bugs.debian.org,434388-done@bugs.debian.org,435670-done@bugs.debian.org,453937-done@bugs.debian.org,455465-done@bugs.debian.org,507264-done@bugs.debian.org,608627-done@bugs.debian.org,608628-done@bugs.debian.org,612460-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: xresprobe@packages.debian.org, xresprobe@packages.qa.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#771952: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:33:20 +0000
- Message-id: <E1XwIU4-00060A-Rj@franck.debian.org>
Version: 0.4.23debian1-1+rm Dear submitter, as the package xresprobe has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/771952 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---