Your message dated Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:49:39 +0000 with message-id <[🔎] E1WFNdj-0005Ds-Om@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#738737: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #509224, regarding ditz: Issues should have a less-changing identifier by default, like DVCS revisions usually have to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 509224: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509224 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ditz: Issues should have a less-changing identifier by default, like DVCS revisions usually have
- From: Pierre THIERRY <nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:40:56 +0100
- Message-id: <20081219214056.GA27274@pape.arcanes.fr.eu.org>
Package: ditz Version: 0.5-1 Severity: wishlist As ditz is by design able to work in a distributed workflow, the identifiers used by default should also be distributed-friendly. The identifiers using the component name and a number have the problem that most merges with another set of issues will renumber anything. Like DVCS systems, ditz already uses a hash as an identifier and the beginning of this identifier can already be used to designate an issue to ditz, so using the beginning of this identifier, like DVCS do, would seem to be a good idea. For example, if component foobar has been added an issue 6f25f4fe1d2ebce20f0b97df35f5eb2ba6245586, 6f25f4fe or foobar-6f25f4fe might be good default identifiers. Regards, Pierre -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (900, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ditz depends on: ii libtrollop-ruby 1.9-1 command-line argument processing l ii ruby1.8 1.8.7.72-1 Interpreter of object-oriented scr ditz recommends no packages. ditz suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- nowhere.man@levallois.eu.org OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8AAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 509224-done@bugs.debian.org,589030-done@bugs.debian.org,735434-done@bugs.debian.org,705149-done@bugs.debian.org,
- Cc: ditz@packages.debian.org, ditz@packages.qa.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#738737: Removed package(s) from unstable
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 12:49:39 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] E1WFNdj-0005Ds-Om@franck.debian.org>
Version: 0.5-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package ditz has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/738737 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---