[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#584321: marked as done (python-rdflib: please add -dbg package)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:22:01 +0100
with message-id <871u18u7yu.fsf@inf-8660.int-evry.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#584321: python-rdflib: please add -dbg package
has caused the Debian Bug report #584321,
regarding python-rdflib: please add -dbg package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
584321: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584321
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: python-rdflib
Version: 2.4.2-1+b1
Severity: wishlist

Please add -dbg package for python-rdflib.

thanks for considering
WM

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi.

Willi Mann <willi@debian.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am 2013-12-17 11:30, schrieb Olivier Berger:
>> On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 09:28:18AM +0200, Willi Mann wrote:
>>>
>>> Please add -dbg package for python-rdflib.
>>>
>>> thanks for considering
>> 
>> I'm not so sure this is still a need of yours after so long, but let me try and respond.
>> 
>> Could you elaborate on your need here ?
>> 
>> I'm not sure I understand the need for debug packages in the case of a pure python library, AFAICT.
>
> python-rdflib is architecture-dependent as it contains a native SPARQL
> parser library (SPARQLParserc.so). Back in 2010, this library caused a
> gcc bug on a specific architecture to occur, such that enigmail would no
> longer build on that architecture (back at that time, mozilla-devscripts
> used python-rdflib, not python-librdf). Having a -dbg package at that
> time would have saved me the time of recompiling the library - on qemu.
> Since enigmail is no longer concerned by this problem, I can no longer
> advocate for "fixing" this wishlist bug.
>

Thanks for the clarification.

Moreover, the C parsing code is now gone, apparently, probably replaced
by pure python code.

Hence closing (I don't expect anyone working on providing this for the
version in stable or before).

Best regards,
-- 
Olivier BERGER 
http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: