[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#722995:



also sprach Konstantinos Poulios <logari81@googlemail.com> [2013.10.28.2237 +0100]:
> The reason is that the
> pypdf library is quite limited so that the pdfs processed with pdfshuffler
> may loose features (e.g. index)

Good reason to revert the patch, although maybe this should be made
even more clear as otherwise people will simply save into
a temporary file and move over the existing file, as is commonly
done when using e.g. the shell redirection features, which also
don't do in-place replacements.

Maybe there should be a warning?

Or even better: isn't there an alternative PDF library we could use,
one that doesn't suck? Or does that just not exist?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Reply to: