[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#713540: ddccontrol: FTBFS: ld: notebook.o: undefined reference to symbol 'round@@GLIBC_2.2.5'



Source: ddccontrol
Version: 0.4.2-10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130620 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Maybe you need to add explicitly the offending lib to LD flags.

Relevant part:
> gcc -I/usr/include/libxml2 -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/gio-unix-2.0/ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libdrm -I/usr/include/harfbuzz -g -O2 -Wall -DDATADIR=\"/usr/share/ddccontrol-db\" -DBINDIR=\"/usr/bin\" -o .libs/gddccontrol -pthread main.o notebook.o gprofile.o fspatterns.o  -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so -lpango-1.0 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libfreetype.so -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 ../lib/.libs/libddccontrol.so -lxml2 -lpci
> /usr/bin/ld: notebook.o: undefined reference to symbol 'round@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6: error adding symbols: DSO missing from command line
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

The full build log is available from:
   http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2013/06/20/ddccontrol_0.4.2-10_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.


Reply to: