Re: proposal for the reverse depending buggy packages [Was: Re: lesstif2 to motif transition]

To: openmotif@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: proposal for the reverse depending buggy packages [Was: Re: lesstif2 to motif transition]
From: Graham Inggs <graham@nerve.org.za>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 22:08:14 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CAM8zJQvU25j+xjdqZeB6b1XFjPENZ5DaQPG2ziZ6513j1w4k9A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 51895C64.8020704@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 51881A33.6030901@debian.org> <CAM8zJQtU8wVF=ZcD_KtArSKSNUrF7Vnn=yiZYk2RVntn0hKViQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 51895C64.8020704@debian.org>

I agree with the message. I can suggest some minor grammatical changes though.

On 7 May 2013 21:56, Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> wrote:

This is currently no problem as
this is pulled in by the lesstif2-dev package that you do depend on.

I would say "This is current not a problem as"

Lesstif2 was originally created as an
free alternative for motif, but in the mean time became unmaintained and

meantime - one word

To ease the transition that will happen some time soon, we will follow

sometime - one word

...and then some of my own typos:

> hotswap - libxtdev, libxext-dev, libxp-dev

hotswap - libxt-dev, libxext-dev, libxp-dev

> xtel - libxpd-dev

xtel - libxp-dev

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: proposal for the reverse depending buggy packages [Was: Re: lesstif2 to motif transition]
  - From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>

References:
- lesstif2 to motif transition
  - From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- proposal for the reverse depending buggy packages [Was: Re: lesstif2 to motif transition]
  - From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>