Hi Graham, On 06-05-13 23:01, Paul Gevers wrote: > My proposal would be (with your approval) to just get motif into > unstable/main and start converting the dependencies with the help of > their maintainers (the libraries can coexist). Because the -dev package > name has to change all build dependencies would have to get a > source-full update. I would have liked to stage everything in > experimental, but due to this (quoted from ftp-master) nasty dak bug, > that would leave unstable (non-free) without (open-)motif. I was thinking, how well did it go with your building of all reverse dependencies, and how well would it work if lesstif2-dev would be a transitional package that depends on libmotif-dev? If that would work at all, I think that is a good alternative to my proposal above. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature