Bug#664809: marked as done (wdm: Please add calls to pam_selinux module in pam files)
Your message dated Thu, 17 May 2012 11:21:07 +0000
with message-id <E1SUylX-0003c9-Ns@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#664809: fixed in wdm 1.28-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #664809,
regarding wdm: Please add calls to pam_selinux module in pam files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
664809: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664809
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wdm
Version: 1.28-11
Severity: wishlist
User: selinux-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: selinux-dm
Dear maintainer,
To ease the use of selinux in debian for the user, it could be
convinient if the desktop managers were calling the necessary pam
module required to properly set the user security context.
If SELinux is not enabled on the user system, the pam module will
return a success.
You can find an example in my proposed a patch[0] for GDM3 or in the
login service.
You can find my inital request for feedback on debian-devel[1].
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661289
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/03/msg00295.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: wdm
Source-Version: 1.28-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
wdm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz
to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz
wdm_1.28-12.dsc
to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-12.dsc
wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb
to main/w/wdm/wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 664809@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Agustin Martin Domingo <agmartin@debian.org> (supplier of updated wdm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:28:46 +0200
Source: wdm
Binary: wdm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.28-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Agustin Martin Domingo <agmartin@debian.org>
Description:
wdm - WINGs Display Manager - an xdm replacement with a WindowMaker loo
Closes: 664809
Changes:
wdm (1.28-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Add calls to pam_selinux module in pam files. Thanks Laurent
Bigonville for bug report and proposed change (Closes: #664809).
Checksums-Sha1:
c62abeacc55c44e968640402d149b87a633039ff 1444 wdm_1.28-12.dsc
72e1293d11915a0cc6bc6ddef9e9d4842d9ba4a4 68422 wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz
9b3631a52ad53d9dbab5c3339ffcc3afedd0fe1e 338280 wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
03b124b2a1cdacd57c5fee051411da764f0164cc43bb05cb3a79884e4ae5577d 1444 wdm_1.28-12.dsc
3d57a0b50c3a9a5c90443b50f1765c5baa52514ed6ad7b486737a891a413c3e1 68422 wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz
10a4dbcf5764a51f9cc176021b3469bb5c211efbb91937bc5bcfa4da8baecc2e 338280 wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb
Files:
7dd306ed57634dee385e6ea6f346ebc3 1444 x11 optional wdm_1.28-12.dsc
aaf9e2989768b117288bd0edc317fe07 68422 x11 optional wdm_1.28-12.debian.tar.gz
0ac3bd26bbab1f1e03077bcf6dc881f5 338280 x11 optional wdm_1.28-12_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPtMqbTShHqj72DpwRAkfYAJwKZJw+ZNOv6hL5bvJdE/YoMnEmWQCfT3YK
zLqBtFFgnw4nRly6RUjcQok=
=KoDl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: