[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#320841: marked as done (powernowd: Niceness levels should be partialy includable)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:23:13 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1TbD4z-0002Rs-HV@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#602052: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #320841,
regarding powernowd: Niceness levels should be partialy includable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
320841: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=320841
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: powernowd
Version: 0.90-3
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

it might be nice to have powernowd include minimaly niced processes
(nice 5) in the calculation while still ignoring heavily niced
processes (nice 19). But I'm not sure if that is feasable.

I guess powernowd currently only looks at the overall stats (like the
second line in top) for niced processes and considering only some
would require going through the full task list. Is that right? In that
case it might be to expensive to do it.

MfG
	Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-frosties-2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages powernowd depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1.00-2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package powernowd has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/602052

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: