[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#665461: marked as done (makedev.postinst for GNU/kFreeBSD)



Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:03:05 +0000
with message-id <E1SDv9F-0005uZ-DQ@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#665472: fixed in makedev 2.3.1-91
has caused the Debian Bug report #665472,
regarding makedev.postinst for GNU/kFreeBSD
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
665472: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665472
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: makedev
Version: 2.3.1-90
Severity: serious
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org

The postinst script is defective for GNU/kFreeBSD.
Virtual terminals are named "/dev/ttyv[0-9]*" for
that port. The present script is unable to complete
the postinst configuration since "/dev/tty[0-9]*"
are rightfully missing.

The call to MAKEDEV for creation of "/dev/tty?"
is declined with an ugly message, pointing at
non-Linux filesystems. This is harmless.

Serious is the fact that

   chmod g-r,o= /dev/tty[0-9]*

is failing, thus aborting the script.

Regards
  Mats Erik Andersson, DM



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: makedev
Source-Version: 2.3.1-91

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
makedev, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

makedev_2.3.1-91.diff.gz
  to main/m/makedev/makedev_2.3.1-91.diff.gz
makedev_2.3.1-91.dsc
  to main/m/makedev/makedev_2.3.1-91.dsc
makedev_2.3.1-91_all.deb
  to main/m/makedev/makedev_2.3.1-91_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 665472@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> (supplier of updated makedev package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:55:47 +0200
Source: makedev
Binary: makedev
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.3.1-91
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
Description: 
 makedev    - creates device files in /dev
Closes: 665461 665472
Changes: 
 makedev (2.3.1-91) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Abort postinst when running no non-Linux kernels.
     (Closes: #665461, #665472)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 37122ab09a63d60cbbca5599323babf70f98d324 1085 makedev_2.3.1-91.dsc
 3dda2e6c63044317ff8539fdaecf7f0d661e38d0 50043 makedev_2.3.1-91.diff.gz
 3fe59995f3f1db7b9d2dcadfd1102027ec763e18 42592 makedev_2.3.1-91_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 6efde2aedb309f48acdd65f478607825df631e1f08dd797b558bec0fbdb82539 1085 makedev_2.3.1-91.dsc
 ad3f081be4ec93bbff01acd2216819f7416ce8352f216108a0e7739b85e141b1 50043 makedev_2.3.1-91.diff.gz
 196ac98520e7989735c17aa05055475bda45d46c169eb26118d3618a62b0b702 42592 makedev_2.3.1-91_all.deb
Files: 
 6c3e50dc31fa4dac1362d3a5e2b4b580 1085 admin extra makedev_2.3.1-91.dsc
 cf75ecd663f614f96f3de18f2d13a19b 50043 admin extra makedev_2.3.1-91.diff.gz
 c857681083d9221db31c437808d5d14f 42592 admin extra makedev_2.3.1-91_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/kFreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk921TEACgkQC19io6rUCv+VAwCdHNGNFDXHSXSotG8M/W1+Uu/I
lycAn2WmihoxrlJD1+tNVZNeCEVXUA0z
=wNF9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: