Bug#644498: marked as done (nitpic: not installable in sid, needs upgrade to new binutils)
Your message dated Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:25:23 +0200
with message-id <20111006172523.GI2757@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#644498: nitpic: not installable in sid, needs upgrade to new binutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #644498,
regarding nitpic: not installable in sid, needs upgrade to new binutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
644498: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=644498
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nitpic
Version: 0.1-12
Architecture: i386
Severity: serious
User: treinen@debian.org
Usertags: edos-outdated
nitpic depends on binutils (< 2.21.53.20110923). However, we have in sid:
% rmadison --suite=sid --architecture=i386 binutils
binutils | 2.21.90.20111004-1 | sid | i386
-Ralf.
--
Ralf Treinen
Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes
Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 13:50:19 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Package: nitpic
> Version: 0.1-12
> Architecture: i386
> Severity: serious
> User: treinen@debian.org
> Usertags: edos-outdated
>
> nitpic depends on binutils (< 2.21.53.20110923). However, we have in sid:
>
> % rmadison --suite=sid --architecture=i386 binutils
> binutils | 2.21.90.20111004-1 | sid | i386
>
So the package needs a binNMU, not a bug.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
Reply to: