Bug#636800: gecko-mediaplayer: files installed into wrong directory
Package: gecko-mediaplayer
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: grave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
1.0.4-1 installs the *.so files into /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/mozilla/plugins.
But iceweasel doesn't look there for plugins and hence gecko-mediaplayer can't
be used.
I was able to fix this issue by passing --plugindir=/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins to
configure. The issue is probably due to gecko-mediaplayer's configure script. It
takes libdir from libnspr4-dev (thus overwriting --libdir passed to configure)
which is /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu here. And then the *.so files get installed
to $(libdir)/mozilla/plugins.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (650, 'unstable'), (601, 'testing'), (600, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages gecko-mediaplayer depends on:
ii gconf2 2.32.4-1 GNOME configuration database syste
ii gnome-mplayer 1.0.4-1+b1 A GTK+ interface for MPlayer
ii iceweasel 5.0-6 Web browser based on Firefox
ii konqueror 4:4.6.5-1 advanced file manager, web browser
ii libc6 2.13-14 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii libcurl3-gnutls 7.21.7-1 Multi-protocol file transfer libra
ii libdbus-1-3 1.4.14-1 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.94-4 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii libgcc1 1:4.6.1-5 GCC support library
ii libglib2.0-0 2.28.6-1 The GLib library of C routines
ii libstdc++6 4.6.1-5 GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii xulrunner-1.9.1 1.9.1.19-3 XUL + XPCOM application runner
gecko-mediaplayer recommends no packages.
gecko-mediaplayer suggests no packages.
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOPHdwAAoJEGny/FFupxmTMVEP/278a57xRjj4ivwsWzOlg1w2
99ElPrH5UmY1KfxdRJCBpxdfBdSv+65uasKp9mU4byAxpLTVVWU/PSCr2xvMzwHI
GnjpFbdYNgJN5qmcpRii5XZ84l5TWtrBc/HzQWXGAK6lrSJ+zJsPs01qEg93QcvP
mopF8T/rGuDa5SpjrEcvrpkAyClaXSZlapyHwLYhvdTpazyWFfoneTzh2ce0lZVM
2P7K8i/0IpmnRfFk1EII/aP3pfzVCG6BYetZRcaz174G3SUSf73bFW61zTVSMde8
ICldtCV440xXQaMD8ww4v4TVhXrlmG1jp/I/Z7y1EEvW6nMlcJKlLYV51Nt4TX/h
wQE+Bd++Y0BqTFCnA0ChrgMLSf+ztwimJq4bBguR30WY5/aEc7LatFtLayL6Yr+P
bHQQuznFLJ3HCo9zaVbhy65+BI2r/SK1JuisDsfY4lsx8j/Y3QTu0s9JXFoUrzLV
22eN6yiPSMvfmB8/5+tHhMlY6jntDebNsuspUSsjniHNVE5K2Fr62Q7WLAkkDyH6
enqE1s1uZ9uGN3Nvjh2hOPPKRYq+yqw75Dqhzs9O3f7WzYVG1pNaoodESO4L7Ys1
GkewFu79LB+ug+4GnW5qcRK1vL3r7S0zRAqTto3L+NVFOkqkxzVagMLOGZVCWtCW
MWLja9wBEjRIOFH3Mc0v
=pW3o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: