[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#629816: ifrit: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by `/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/ifrit'. Stop.



Source: ifrit
Version: 3.3.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110607 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/c++   -DI_USE_CURSES -DI_EXTERNAL_CONFIGURATION -DI_CHECK1 -g -O2   -Wno-deprecated -O3 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include/vtk-5.6 -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include -I/usr/lib/openmpi/include/openmpi -I/usr/include/tcl8.5 -I/usr/include/python2.6 -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/qt4 -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../configure -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../core -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../help -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../docs -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../shells/configure -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../shells/generic -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../shells/base -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../shells/cl -I/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/../shells/qt   -o CMakeFiles/ifrit.dir/moc_iqtframesubject.o -c /«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build/moc_iqtframesubject.cxx
> make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libdl.so', needed by `/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/ifrit'.  Stop.
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/«BUILDDIR»/ifrit-3.3.4/build'
> make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/ifrit.dir/all] Error 2

The full build log is available from:
   http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2011/06/07/ifrit_3.3.4-2_lsid64.buildlog

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot.  Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.



Reply to: